This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The two U.S. senators from Wyoming are co-sponsoring a plan that immediately would address the problem of leftist federal judges at the entry-court level, in district courts, who have been controlling America's nationwide security and safety policies through their injunctions.
It would simply remove their authority to issue those mandates that follow their own political agendas.
District judges were fans of the practice during President Donald Trump's first term, and immediately resumed their activism when he took office for his second term.
So far, they've issued at least 17 nationwide injunctions that prevent Trump's administration from effectively working to protect the nation's borders, its security, and its safety.
Sens. John Barrasso, the Senate majority whip, and Cynthia Lummis, both Wyoming Republicans, are working on the Judicial Relief Clarification Act, along with a couple dozen other senators.
The chief sponsor is Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and the chief of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Already, one hearing has been held on the plan that would take away from the nation's 677 federal district judges the authority to issue nationwide injunctions, through which several of the judges have tried to control the nation's international policy and practices.
The plan would allow district judges to issue injunctions that would impact only the parties before the court.
"Essentially under JRCA, judges could not halt actions by President Donald Trump's administration on a national level," reported the Cowboy State Daily.
Barrasso explained, 'The Senate Judiciary Committee already started hearings on this legislation, and I expect it will be debated on the Senate floor soon."
The bill also would also make temporary restraining orders immediately appealable.
"Judges are not policymakers — and they have not been elected by the American people to legislate," Lummis told the publication. "Our courts should not be a tool for far-left activists to obstruct every part of President Trump's agenda."
Barrasso has warned, in support of the bill, that "partisan, unelected, district court judges" are trying to "micromanage the president of the United States."
Similar legislation is being developed in the House. There it is called the No Rogue Rulings Act.
According to the report, U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., explained at a hearing recently that judges issuing those nationwide rulings "might be violating federal regulations related to bond."
"They have not been requiring the parties seeking the injunction to put up a bond," she explained.
"Bonds are generally required of plaintiffs seeking a temporary restraining order to cover the costs to defendants in the event that a TRO is granted, but later found to be wrongly issued," the report explained.
Hageman specifically cited James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., for an injunction that purportedly barred Trump from deporting illegal alien criminals.
