This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The U.S. Department of Justice has revealed it will review the prosecution by the leftists in the state of Colorado of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, "on charges she helped an unauthorized person" access the local voting system in 2021, according to a new report.

Colorado Public Radio said the DOJ has filed documents entering the case against Tina Peters, who was accused by officials in the Democrat-run state of attempting to influence a public servant, impersonation and conspiracy.

The Republican was convicted and given several years in prison in her case that developed only months before Jenna Griswold, the Democrat secretary of state in Colorado, allowed lists of election systems passwords to be posted online.

Griswold then apparently schemed to conceal her actions.

WorldNetDaily has reported on the case, where she fiddled with those passwords, after scheming with all Democrats on the state Supreme Court to try to take President Donald Trump off the state's 2024 ballot.

The U.S. Supreme Court blocked her agenda with a scolding.

Griswold also "played an integral role" in the case against Peters.

But prosecutors gave Griswold a pass on her actions.

The new report explains the DOJ confirmed it is reviewing the Peters case.

And while the federal agency cannot overturn a state conviction, it is true that Peters' appeal of her case now has been moved into federal court.

The report explained a court filing by Yaakov Roth, an acting assistant attorney general, said the DOJ is evaluating the Peters case based on an executive order signed by President Donald Trump and it will focus on "whether the case was 'oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives.'"

Roth said, "Parallel to these proceedings and Ms. Peters' direct appeal, the Department of Justice is reviewing cases across the nation for abuses of the criminal justice process."

It's part of Trump's order "Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government," the report said.

In that scenario, under the Joe Biden administration, multiple court cases were brought that had the appearance of being based on politics. At the apex of the agenda was the lawfare against Trump, where multiple Democrat prosecutors launched multiple felony charges against Trump, trying to keep him from the presidency in 2024.

One of those cases, now dropped, included felony counts against Trump for his handling of government documents after his first presidency.

But at the same time, prosecutors gave Joe Biden a pass after classified documents from when he was only a vice president were found concealed in the garage at his home and at various offices he had used.

CPR claims that Peters has become a "celebrity" in the world of "those who embrace Trump's lies that he lost the 2020 election due to fraud."

However, the facts that have been uncovered have confirmed at least two undue influences on that election result. One was Mark Zuckerberg's decision to hand out $400 million plus to mostly leftist elections officials who often used it to recruit voters in Democrat districts. Never before in American election history had such a sum of money been used to influence an election outcome.

The second factor was the FBI's decision to interfere in the voting when it falsely claimed that Biden family scandals uncovered in a laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden were Russian disinformation when in fact they were all true. The FBIi told media outlets to suppress the information, and a subsequent polling showed that action alone likely gave the presidency to Biden.

The political ideology used against Peters appeared during her sentencing to nine years behind bars, when Judge Matthew Barrett alleged, "You're a charlatan who used, and is still using, your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that's been proven to be junk time and time again."

During her trial her lawyers pointed out that the trial court refused to allow presentation of evidence regarding allegations about her county's voting machines.

The CPR report claimed that the DOJ's interest in a political prosecution amounted to "a new stage in the administration's effort to use the federal government to promote the president's political interests."

Peters' lawyer, John Case, said, "Tina was targeted because she executed her duty under federal law to preserve election data that the secretary of state deleted from every other Colorado county. We welcome the federal investigation."

WND reported only weeks ago that an appeals court threw out a "contempt" finding also announced against Peters by a judge because there was no evidence to support the allegation by the retired judge, Paul Dunkelman.